As Mozilla lurched from one misguided design decision to another, breaking extensions and frustrating users, Pale Moon kept its traditional, highly functional interface. Pale Moon was an optimized version of Firefox, eliminating some features most people did not use in return for better performance and stability. So I cannot agree with these criticisms, and recommend Pale Moon to everyone who wants to use a less bloated and more customisable browser. Windows XP compatibility is not broken, you only need to use the Atom targeted builds. There are a few web sites that misbehave, but not more than with Chromium. 105 extensions enabled and 30 disabled, these all work flawlessly). All of my favourite extensions work (I have atm. With regard to the incompatibilities mentioned in the previous reviews: as of now (Sep 2015) I don't really feel this a big problem. Although PM has its flaws (coming from the Firefox heritage, like high memory consumption), all-in-all I am satisfied with it and use it exclusively. I recently returned to PM after being disappointed in Chromium-based browsers (Opera and SRWare Iron in particular). Reading the latest reviews of Pale Moon (hereafter PM) I felt like writing a review, since I think writing this browser off is a mistake.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |